Home / News / Proskauer Defends Perplexity AI in Reddit Lawsuit – Impact for Small Biz
Proskauer Defends Perplexity AI in Reddit Lawsuit – Impact for Small Biz
Proskauer Rose LLP is defending Perplexity AI against Reddit’s copyright lawsuit, arguing that the AI’s use of public Reddit posts falls under fair use and existing API agreements. A New York federal judge will soon decide whether the case can move forward, a decision that could reshape how AI search tools cite local businesses.
Key Highlights
- ✓Proskauer Rose defends Perplexity AI against Reddit's copyright lawsuit.
- ✓Judge will decide if AI can continue using public Reddit data.
- ✓Potential limits on AI data sources could reduce local business citations.
- ✓Businesses should strengthen owned media and structured data to stay visible.
What Happened
In early October 2024, Reddit sued Perplexity AI, alleging that the fast‑growing AI search assistant copied and republished Reddit content without permission. Perplexity responded with a motion to dismiss, and its counsel, Proskauer Rose LLP, stressed that the firm never "dropped" Reddit as a partner or data source. Instead, Proskauer contends that Reddit’s claims are overly broad and that the AI’s reliance on publicly posted material is protected by fair use and the terms of Reddit’s API.
The dispute now sits before a New York federal judge, who will determine whether Reddit’s allegations can proceed. While the legal arguments are technical, the outcome could have far‑reaching implications for any business that depends on AI‑driven search tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, or Google AI Overviews to attract customers.
Key Details
- Parties: Reddit (plaintiff) vs. Perplexity AI (defendant), with Proskauer Rose LLP representing Perplexity.
- Core Issue: Whether Perplexity’s ingestion of Reddit content infringes copyright or breaches Reddit’s API terms.
- Legal Angle: Proskauer argues that the AI’s data collection is covered by the fair‑use doctrine and that Reddit’s lawsuit seeks to restrict the flow of public information to AI models.
- Current Status: A motion to dismiss has been filed; a ruling is expected in the coming weeks.
- Broader Context: The case adds to a growing wave of litigation targeting AI companies for how they train models on publicly available data.
What It Means For Your Business
1. Visibility in AI Search Is at Stake
AI assistants scrape the web to answer queries. If courts begin limiting the data sources these tools can use, the knowledge graph that fuels AI‑generated answers could shrink, resulting in fewer local‑business citations and reduced organic discovery.
2. Content Ownership Becomes Critical
Businesses should audit the content they publish online. When valuable product details, reviews, or FAQs reside on platforms that might be barred from AI training, visibility can suffer. Leveraging structured data (schema markup) and keeping Google Business Profiles up‑to‑date become essential fallback signals.
3. Legal Preparedness Pays Off
Even if you are not directly involved in a high‑profile lawsuit, understanding the legal arguments helps you craft safer content strategies. For instance, applying clear licensing terms to user‑generated content can protect you if an AI platform seeks to index that material.
4. Opportunity to Influence the Conversation
Small businesses can join industry groups that lobby for balanced AI regulations. By highlighting the economic value of AI‑driven discovery, you help shape policies that keep local listings visible in AI search results.
Actionable Steps for Small Business Owners
- Audit Your Online Assets: Map where key business information lives—website, social media, review sites—and ensure each location uses proper schema and remains crawlable.
- Strengthen Direct Listings: Claim and optimize your Google Business Profile, Bing Places, and Apple Maps entries. These listings are less likely to be affected by rulings on AI data sources.
- Leverage Owned Media: Publish blog posts, FAQs, and how‑to guides on your own domain. AI tools tend to prioritize authoritative, original content.
- Monitor Legal Developments: Keep an eye on the Reddit‑Perplexity case and related AI copyright lawsuits. Be ready to adjust your SEO strategy if a court decision narrows the data AI can use.
- Engage with AI Platforms: Some services offer partnership programs that ensure your data is accurately represented. Exploring these options early can safeguard your visibility.
Key Takeaways
- The Reddit vs. Perplexity decision could reshape the data landscape for AI search.
- Restricting public data sources may reduce AI‑generated citations for local businesses.
- Proactive SEO, structured data, and ownership of content are essential defenses.
- Staying informed and participating in policy discussions can help protect your visibility.
---
Bottom line: The courtroom drama may feel distant, but its verdict will directly influence how AI assistants surface local businesses. Preparing now lets you safeguard—and even enhance—your presence in the next generation of search.
Why It Matters
The Reddit‑Perplexity lawsuit is more than a legal tussle; it strikes at the heart of how AI search engines gather the information they present to users. For small and local businesses, AI tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity have become a new front page of the internet, often surfacing answers that include business names, hours, and reviews. If courts rule that AI cannot pull from public forums such as Reddit, the pool of data feeding these models shrinks, meaning fewer opportunities for your business to be cited in AI‑generated answers.
In practical terms, this could translate into lower discoverability on platforms that many consumers now rely on for quick answers. While traditional SEO remains vital, the rise of AI‑driven search adds a layer of dependency on how openly data can be harvested. By ensuring your core business information lives on your own domain, is properly structured with schema markup, and appears in authoritative directories, you create a safety net that AI tools can still reference—even if third‑party data sources become restricted.
Moreover, the case underscores the growing need for businesses to stay informed about AI‑related legal developments. Engaging with industry groups and advocating for balanced regulations helps shape a future where AI continues to amplify, rather than diminish, local business visibility.
Why This Matters For Your Business
The Reddit‑Perplexity lawsuit goes beyond a copyright dispute; it challenges the very foundation of how AI assistants collect and surface information. If a court limits AI’s ability to draw from public forums, the data pool that powers tools like ChatGPT and Perplexity will contract, reducing the chances that local businesses appear in AI‑generated answers. For business owners, this shift could mean a noticeable dip in discoverability on the platforms consumers increasingly use for quick answers. Maintaining accurate, schema‑rich content on your own website and in trusted directories becomes a critical hedge, ensuring AI tools still have reliable sources to reference even if third‑party data is curtailed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will this lawsuit affect my business’s presence on ChatGPT or other AI assistants?
Potentially. If the court limits the data AI can use, platforms may rely more heavily on owned content and structured data, making it essential for businesses to have accurate, crawlable information on their own sites.
Should I remove my business’s content from Reddit or similar forums?
Not necessarily. Removing content could diminish visibility. Instead, duplicate key information on your own website and add schema markup so AI can still reference it.
How can I protect my business’s data from future AI lawsuits?
Use clear licensing terms for user‑generated content, keep your website’s terms of service current, and consider joining industry coalitions that lobby for balanced AI data policies.
Is your business showing up in AI search?
Get your free AI visibility audit - see if ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI actually recommend you.
